Building: Did someone clone me?

Last months I’ve been working on a new project called Last years I’ve been analyzing many phishing websites for fun. During those analysis I realized that many companies could improve on detecting clones of their websites. Techniques are available and even not hard to implement, but often not used.

The goal of did someone clone me is to:

A free service that notifies its users when their website is cloned and used in a phishing attack. This allows them to be aware of the attacks and brand abuse, but also take necessary mitigations such as initiating a takedown or investigating the phishing site.

A video explaining the concept:


Creating a ProtonVPN wireless network

Sometimes I prefer to encrypt my connection or hide my IP-address. During Black Friday I bought a ProtonVPN Plus account which allows me to switch IP-addresses and countries easily. At home I’m using a network based on Ubiquiti hardware <3. I already have quite some network configuration such as different VLANs to protect devices from each other, for example I separated all my home automation from the other devices.

Adding a separate wireless network that automatically tunnels all my traffic through ProtonVPN is on my wishlist for quite a while. That would allow me to seperate my research devices from other devices and hide my home IP-address at the same time.

So the first thing I do of course is: Googling. I found some information on how to configure ProtonVPN on the Ubiquiti USG itself, however this required modifications on the CLI. Which I didn’t like, I will brick my network for sure. I want to keep that part clean as its working great.


Msfenum: automation of MSF auxiliary modules

Low hanging fruit scans can be very useful when performing a penetration test. Especially when performing a internal penetration test a low hanging fruit scan can be very effective. Usually when performing a internal penetration test I am using among other things the Metasploit auxiliary modules to quickly enumerate the network. The modules can give some interesting findings very quickly, such as:

Those findings are quick wins and can give you an entry point to the network in order to escalate privileges (e.g. MS17-010 -> DA creds) pretty fast. This helps to tell your customer that you were able to obtain high network permissions within a few hours (if you are able, a malicious attacker is able as well).


Smart home: remote command execution (RCE)

During my spare time I am playing around with smart home/domotica/internet of things hardware and software. A while ago I decided to take a look at the security of these solutions, just because I was curious and because it’s fun. Within this research only smart home controllers were investigated. The controllers are the brain within a smart home, whenever an attacker gains access to this component, he is able to control the complete smart home.


Exploiting the forensic investigator (AWE course training)

This summer i am attending the Advanced Windows Exploitation (AWE) course of Offensive PhotoRec-logoSecurity. The AWE course has been on my wishlist for a long time, because the previous courses (OSCP and OSCE) were amazing. One of the requirements for the AWE course, according to offsec, is a will to suffer intensely.

After completing OSCE, i’ve spend quite some time on exploit development. My thesis was to discover previously unknown vulnerabilities and exploit them. During this thesis i discovered a vulnerability in Wireshark (CVE-2014-2299).

However, this is around three years ago. To get ready for the AWE course, i really have to refresh my exploit development skills. So far, i wrote the following exploits to get ready for AWE:


How a spamfilter can help you to drop a shell

A while ago i discovered a cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) in the McAfee E-mail Gateway (MEG) 7.6.4. I reported this vulnerability to McAfee, they fixed it within a few months. The security advisory can be found over here. MEG is an application that can be used to filter out malicious attachments from e-mails, however due to the vulnerability an attacker is able to abuse this functionality to drop a malicious file.

The McAfee E-mail Gateway is replacing a malicious file with a warning HTML-file (1_warning.html). I saw that this HTML-file is displaying the filename of the replaced malicious file (e.g. malicious.xlsx). This made me curious, I decided to check whether it was possible to use this filename to perform a cross-site scripting attack because it was used within HTML-context.

In order to check whether the XSS was present, i created a malicious Excel document. The file needs to be malicious in order to be replaced by the McAfee E-mail Gateway. The file was named “file<IMG SRC=x onerror=”alert(‘XSS’)”>jem.xls“. I e-mailed this file to a e-mailbox that was protected by McAfee E-mail Gateway. When opening the warning HTML-file, the following behavior became clear:


Compromising a honeypot network through the Kippo password when logstash exec is used

This is a shared post by @rikvduijn and @wesleyneelen.

We have been playing with Honeypots lately (shoutout to Theo and Sebastian for adding their honeypots to the network), collecting and visualizing the data from the honeypots is done via ELK. The environment contains a central server to centralize all the collected data from the honeypots that are connected to it. The environment is visualized in the following diagram:


In order to collect interesting data on Dutch IP’s we run every event through a filter adding Geo location based on IP. After that we run all events that pertain to Dutch IP’s through a Python script using the logstash function exec.


Windows credentials phishing using Metasploit

A while ago i came across a blog post from @enigma0x3. In this blog post a method was Untitled2described to perform a phishing attack to gather user credentials using Powershell. It is a great way to get the credentials of a user. This attack can be used if privilege escalation is hard (try harder) or not a option. In real life scenario’s i noticed that privilege escalation can be hard, for example on fully patched terminal servers. With this phishing method, you still can get the (network)credentials of the user. These credentials can be used to pivot into the network. I got some ideas to improve the attack:


Bash data exfiltration through DNS (using bash builtin functions)

After gaining ‘blind’ command execution access to a compromised Linux host, data exfiltration can be difficult when the system ibinbash2s protected by a firewall. Sometimes these firewalls prevent the compromised host to establish connections to the internet. In these cases, data exfiltration through the DNS-protocol can be useful. In a lot of cases DNS-queries are not blocked by a firewall.  I’ve had a real life situation like this, which i will describe later on.

There are several oneliners on the internet available to exfiltrate command output through DNS. However, i noticed that these are using Linux applications (xxd, od, hexdump, etc), which are not always present on a minimalistic target system. I decided to create a oneliner, which is only using Bash builtin functionalities. The oneliner can be used whenever command execution is possible and Bash is installed on the compromised system.


Reading Outlook using Metasploit

In penetration tests, it sometimes can be hard to escalate privileges on a (WindowsOutlook) target system. In this situation it can be useful to gain access to resources with sensitive information, such as passwords.

Metasploit does not have any module to read email messages from a local Outlook installation. Outlook can however contain a lot of sensitive and useful information in a penetration test, such as networkcredentials. I decided to create a Metasploit module which can read and/or search the local Outlook email messages.


In order to do this, the module is using powershell. The following powershell script is used by the Metasploit module:


CVE-2014-6332: it’s raining shells

This is a shared post by me (@wesleyneelen) and Rik van Duijn (@rikvduijn)

Today @yuange tweeted a proof of concept for CVE-2014-6223. CVE-2014-6332 is a critical Internet Explorer vulnerability that was patched with MS-14-064. The POC was able to execute the application notepad.exe. We wanted to pop some actual shells with this so now the race began to find a way of executing more than just notepad of calc. The “great” thing is this vulnerability affects Windows 95 IE 3.0 until Windows 10 IE 11 from a pentesters perspective this is awesome from a blue team perspective this will make you cry.

CVE-2014-6332 alliedve.htm allie(win95+ie3-win10+ie11) dve copy by yuange in 2009.

— yuange (@yuange75) 12 november 2014

We wanted to pop shells that’s why we created a Metasploit module, this allows us to adapt our exploit when needed and gives us the usability of the Metasploit framework. This gives the ability to start lots of different payloads supported by the Metasploit framework.


Shellshock: a lot of QNAP’s still vulnerable

Shellshock is a critical bug in the Bash software. Bash is software which is used on a lot of unix based operating systems. Shellshock was disclosed onQNAP_logo the 24th september of 2014, and the bug was assigned CVE-2014-6271. Analysis of the source code history of Bash shows the vulnerabilities had existed since version 1.03 of Bash released in September 1989.

QNAP’s Network Attached Storage (NAS) are vulnerable to Shellshock. The vulnerability can be exploited by (for example) executing the following post CURL command:

curl -H "User-Agent: () { :; }; /bin/cat /etc/passwd" http://ip:8080/cgi-bin/authLogin.cgi -v

There are two solutions offered by QNAP in order to fix this vulnerability:


CVE-2014-2299: Wireshark MPEG file parser buffer overflow

Around the 6th of March 2014 i reported a security issue (CVE-2014-2299) to the developers ofWireshark-logo Wireshark. I discovered the vulnerability in Wireshark using file fuzzing. The versions 1.10.0 to 1.10.5 and 1.8.0 to 1.8.12 of Wireshark are affected by the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is present in the wiretap/mpeg.c file. The maximum packed size was not checked correctly, so the vulnerability could lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) or arbitrary code execution. The exact modification which is done by the developers of Wireshark to fix the problem, can be found here:


First blog post.

Hello vulnerable world.